Cost-effectiveness analysis of chronic hepatitis C treatment in the prison population in Spain.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of direct-acting antiviral (DAAs) treatment versus non-treatment in prisoners awaiting treatment for chronic hepatitis C (CHC) and to analyse the clinical and economic impact of the treatment on liver complications and mortality. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A lifetime Markov model was developed to simulate treatment and disease progression from an estimated cohort of 4,408 CHC prisoners treated with DAAs over 2 years (50% of patient each year) versus no treatment. In the treated cohort, a sustained viral response of 95% was associated. Patient characteristics, transition probabilities, utilities and costs (pharmacological and healthcare states) were obtained from published literature. The model estimated healthcare costs and benefits, incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) based on total costs and the quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and avoided clinical events. A National Healthcare System perspective was adopted with a 3% annual discount rate for both costs and health outcomes. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess uncertainty. RESULTS: In the DDA treated cohort, the model estimated a decrease of 92% of decompensated cirrhosis and 83% of hepatocellular carcinoma, 88% liver-related mortality cases were reduced, 132 liver transplants were avoided. The treatment achieved an additional 5.0/QALYs (21.2 vs. 16.2) with an incremental cost of €3,473 (€24,088 vs. €20,615) per patient with an ICUR of €690 per QALY gained. DISCUSSION: Considering the willingness-to-pay threshold used in Spain (€22,000-30,000/QALY), DAAs treatment for prisoners with CHC is a highly cost-effective strategy, reduces infection transmission, increases survival and reduces complications due to liver disease, as well as the cost associated with its management.

Is the universal population Hepatitis C virus screening a cost-effective strategy? A systematic review of the economic evidence.

OBJECTIVE: Efficient strategies are needed in order to achieve the objective of the WHO of eradicating Hepatitis C virus (HCV). Hepatitis C infection can be eliminated by a combination of direct acting antiviral (DAA). The problem is that many individuals remain undiagnosed. The objective is to conduct a systematic review of the evidence on economic evaluations that analyze the screening of HCV followed by treatment with DAAs. METHODS: Eleven databases were performed in a 2015-2018-systematic review. Inclusion criteria were economic evaluations that included incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in terms of cost per life year gained or quality-adjusted life year. RESULTS: A total of 843 references were screened. Sixteen papers/posters meet the inclusion criteria. Ten of them included a general population screening. Other populations included were baby-boomer, people who inject drugs, prisoners or immigrants. Comparator was "standard of care", other high-risk populations or no-screening. Most of the studies are based on Markov model simulations and they mostly adopted a healthcare payer´s perspective. ICER for general population screening plus treatment versus high-risk populations or versus routinely performed screening showed to be below the accepted willingness to pay thresholds in most studies and therefore screening plus DAAs strategy is highly cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review shows that screening programmes followed by DAAs treatment is cost-effective not only for high risk population but for general population too. Because today HCV can be easily cured and its long-term consequences avoided, a universal HCV screening plus DAAs therapies should be the recommended strategy to achieve the WHO objectives for HCV eradication by 2030.

Análisis coste-efectividad del tratamiento de la hepatitis C crónica en población reclusa en España / Cost-effectiveness analysis of chronic hepatitis C treatment in the prison population in Spain

OBJETIVOS: Evaluar, en presos con hepatitis C crónica (HCc) pendientes de tratamiento, el coste-efectividad de tratarlos con antivirales de acción directa (AAD) frente a no tratarlos, y analizar el impacto clínico y económico del tratamiento sobre las complicaciones hepáticas y la mortalidad. MATERIAL Y MÉTODO: Se desarrolló un modelo de Markov para simular el tratamiento y proyectar la progresión de la enfermedad de una cohorte estimada de 4.408 reclusos con HCc tratados con AAD en dos años (el 50% cada año) frente a ningún tratamiento. En los tratados, se asoció una respuesta viral sostenida del 95%. Las características de los pacientes, las probabilidades de transición, las utilidades y los costes (farmacológicos y estados de salud) se obtuvieron de publicaciones científicas. El modelo estimó costes y resultados en salud, la relación coste-utilidad incremental (RCUI), a partir de los costes totales y años de vida ajustados por calidad (AVAC) y los eventos clínicos evitados. La perspectiva fue la del Sistema Nacional de Salud (SNS) y se aplicó una tasa de descuento anual (el 3%) para costes y resultados en salud. La robustez de los resultados se evaluó mediante un análisis de sensibilidad. RESULTADOS: En la población tratada, el modelo estimó una reducción del 92% de los casos de cirrosis descompensada y del 83% de carcinoma hepatocelular, se evitaron 132 trasplantes hepáticos y disminuyó el 88% la mortalidad hepática. El tratamiento consiguió 5,0/AVAC adicionales (21,2 frente al 16,2), con un coste incremental de 3.473 euros (24.088 € frente a 20.615 €) por paciente y una RCUI de 690 €/AVAC ganado. DISCUSIÓN: Considerando el umbral de disponibilidad a pagar utilizado en España (22.000-30.000 €/AVAC), el tratamiento con AAD en los presos con HCc es una estrategia altamente coste-efectiva, reduce la transmisión, aumenta la supervivencia y reduce las complicaciones hepáticas, así como los costes asociado a su manejo

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of direct-acting antiviral (DAAs) treatment versus non-treatment in prisoners awaiting treatment for chronic hepatitis C (CHC) and to analyse the clinical and economic impact of the treatment on liver complications and mortality. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A lifetime Markov model was developed to simulate treatment and disease progression from an estimated cohort of 4,408 CHC prisoners treated with DAAs over 2 years (50% of patient each year) versus no treatment. In the treated cohort, a sustained viral response of 95% was associated. Patient characteristics, transition probabilities, utilities and costs (pharmacological and healthcare states) were obtained from published literature. The model estimated healthcare costs and benefits, incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) based on total costs and the quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and avoided clinical events. A National Healthcare System perspective was adopted with a 3% annual discount rate for both costs and health outcomes. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess uncertainty. RESULTS: In the DDA treated cohort, the model estimated a decrease of 92% of decompensated cirrhosis and 83% of hepatocellular carcinoma, 88% liver-related mortality cases were reduced, 132 liver transplants were avoided. The treatment achieved an additional 5.0/QALYs (21.2 vs. 16.2) with an incremental cost of €3,473 (€24,088 vs. €20,615) per patient with an ICUR of €690 per QALY gained. DISCUSSION: Considering the willingness-to-pay threshold used in Spain (€22,000-30,000/QALY), DAAs treatment for prisoners with CHC is a highly cost-effective strategy, reduces infection transmission, increases survival and reduces complications due to liver disease, as well as the cost associated with its management

Cost-effectiveness analysis of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir in patients with chronic hepatitis C: Treatment of patients with absence or mild fibrosis compared to patients with advanced fibrosis.

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) in treatment-naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) genotype 1 (GT1) in the absence or mild fibrosis (F0-F1) versus advanced fibrosis (F2-F4), from the perspective of the Spanish Health System. A Markov model was developed to simulate disease progression, estimating costs and outcomes [life years gained (LYG) and quality-adjusted life years (QALY)] derived from starting with LDV/SOF in patients with F0-F1 compared with F2-F4. Therapy duration was 8 weeks in noncirrhotic patients with viral load <6 million IU/mL and 12 weeks in the remaining patients. Sustained virologic response rates were obtained from real-world cohort studies. Transition probabilities, utilities and direct costs were obtained from the literature. A 3% annual discount rate was applied to costs and outcomes. Sensitivity analyses were performed. LDV/SOF in F0-F1 patients was a dominant strategy, being more effective (19.85 LYG and 19.80 QALY) than beginning treatment in F2-F4 patients (18.63 LYG and 16.25 QALY), generating savings of €9228 per patient (€3661 due to disease management and monitoring). In a cohort of 1000 patients, LDV/SOF in F0-F1 patients decreased the number of cases of decompensated cirrhosis (93%), hepatocellular carcinoma (97%) and liver-related deaths (95%) and prevented 6 liver transplants compared to initiating LDV/SOF in F2-F4 patients. In CHC treatment-naïve GT1 patients, starting treatment with LDV/SOF in patients with F0-F1 compared to those with F2-F4 increases effectiveness by 1.22 LYG and 3.55 QALY gained and reduces disease burden and it is associated with cost savings.